Can money buy Ethereum? On power and protocol politics

Recent months have seen public companies accumulating significant amounts of cryptocurrency, with BitMine Immersion (BMNR), led by Tom Lee, emerging as a notable player by holding around 3.75% of Ethereum's supply. The potential influence these Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) could wield in shaping Ethereum's direction has sparked debate. While some, like Ryan Watkins of Syncracy Capital, believe DATs can leverage their wealth for governance influence, others argue that Ethereum's decentralized governance structure resists such capture. According to Dr. Paul Dylan-Ennis, the culture and structure of Ethereum require consensus and engagement from a diverse community rather than straightforward monetary control. The governance process involves numerous stakeholders and a solid ethos of decentralization. Concerns about power dynamics, especially if a substantial ETH holder attempts to exert direct influence, raise the prospect of creating forked chains and reputational damage. As DATs grow and navigate this complex landscape, their future role in Ethereum governance remains uncertain.

Source 🔗