Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird's lawsuits against crypto ATM operators have sparked claims that regulations are anti-crypto, but this perspective is misguided. Crypto ATMs, which allow users to buy digital currencies, have become tools for fraud, as evidenced by rising concerns from multiple state attorney generals. Nationally, the FBI estimates that Americans lost $240 million to crypto ATM fraud, with alarming statistics showing that nearly all surveyed users in Iowa and a significant majority in DC reported being scammed. The fraud often stems from romance scams and other deceptive practices, pushing victims to use these kiosks without proper warning or training from operators. Furthermore, internal company data reveals that ATM operators frequently ignore red flags regarding suspicious transactions. Despite claims of serving the unbanked, the high fees charged by these machines, which can be as much as 50%, illustrate a predatory business model focused on profit rather than consumer protection. In response, regulators may impose stricter measures to ensure transparency and adequate anti-fraud protections, suggesting that cleaning up fraudulent practices is crucial for maintaining the integrity and future of crypto innovation.

Source 🔗